Much has been said about the growing Emergent Church movement, especially in recent years. A lot of enthusiasm as well as criticism have surrounded the movement and its major proponents. Since the unveiling of Tony Jones’ new book The New Christians: Dispatches from the Emergent Frontier, there has been a significant spike in the amount of dialogue around Emergent Christianity. Although I have had some exposure to the movement through reading books written by some of the more recognizable Emergents such as Brian McLaren, I didn't feel confident that I understood what Emergents or their churches were all about. I decided that I needed to learn more so I read Jones’ book. To my surprise, as I moved through the book, I self-identified with almost all twenty of his descriptions (what he calls "dispatches") of Emergent Christianity. I guess that makes me Emergent, or at least Emerging (I was reminded just recently that we have to be careful to acknowledge the difference between Emerging and Emergent, since the latter is an official organization). How about you? Do the Emergent dispatches resonate with you?
1. Emergents find little importance in the discrete differences between the various flavors of Christianity. Instead, they practice a generous orthodoxy that appreciates the contributions of all Christian movements.
2. Emergents reject the politics and theologies of left versus right. Seeing both sides as a remnant of modernity, they look forward to a more complex reality.
3. The gospel is like lava: no matter how much crust has formed over it, it will always find a weak point and burst through.
4. The emergent phenomenon began in the late 1990s when a group of Christian leaders began a conversation about how postmodernism was affecting the faith.
5. The emergent movement is not exclusively North American; it is growing around the globe.
6. Emergents see God’s activity in all aspects of culture and reject the sacred-secular divide.
7. Emergents believe that an envelope of friendship and reconciliation must surround all debates about doctrine and dogma.
8. Emergents find the biblical call to community more compelling than the democratic call to individual rights. The challenge lies in being faithful to both ideals.
9. The emergent movement is robustly theological; the conviction is that theology and practice are inextricably related, and each invariably informs the other.
10. Emergents believe that theology is local, conversational, and temporary. To be faithful to the theological giants of the past, emergents endeavor to continue their theological dialogue.
11. Emergents believe that awareness of our relative position—to God, to one another, and to history—breeds biblical humility, not relativistic apathy.
12. Emergents embrace the whole Bible, the glory and the pathos.
13. Emergents believe that truth, like god, cannot be definitively articulated by finite human beings.
14. Emergents embrace paradox, especially those that are core components of the Christian story.
15. Emergents hold to a hope-filled eschatology: it was good news when Jesus came the first time, and it will be good news when he returns.
16. Emergents believe that church should function more like an open-source network and less like a hierarchy or a bureaucracy.
17. Emergents start new churches to save their own faith, not necessarily as an outreach strategy.
18. Emergents firmly hold that God’s Spirit—not their own efforts—is responsible for good in the world. The human task is to cooperate with God in what God is already doing.
19. Emergents downplay—or outright reject—the differences between clergy and laity.
20. Emergents believe that church should be just as beautiful and messy as life.
Sunday, March 9, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Hey Ric-
I like a lot of what tony says regarding emerging types of things. Mostly he is right on. Along with you, I resonate with all of these. I think that the difference between Emergent and emerging is big though. Emergent is largely recognized as liberal and not evangelical, while emerging is not. That is a big issue for me.
Thanks for the kind words, Ric. Glad you liked the book.
Tyler, that's a misconception. Emergent is full of evangelicals.
Tony
Who cares if its "evangelical" or not? Evangelical is one of the most nebulous terms on the market, and as any good "emerging" person will recognize, cannot be used as a standard of judgement.
Anyway, I'm skeptical about #16, think 17 is funny in a sad way and think "emergents" need to get over themselves, don't like the wording of 18, and am hesitant about 19. For all of them, my reasoning is mainly due to a desire to value church and tradition.
I'm thinking of evangelical in a theological and biblical way. I know the term is a stigma, I don't like it much either. But when you look at people who are "emerging" but shun "Emergent," I think that is something to look at.
Whoa, did Tony Jones just leave a comment on my blog about Tony Jones' new book? This internet stuff is crazy. Anyway, thanks guys for all of your comments.
wow, i think he did. I agree with Joe... although I am less skeptical of #16. (remember Moltmann's ecclesiology in light of the Trinity?)
Best description of the Emergent movement I've read-thanks!
Post a Comment